Bluegrass Conspiracy Continues: Scratch a Child Support Case And Solve a Murder.
Prepared for Ky. State Representative Stan Lee
By Christopher Hignite
November 6, 2007
corrected, with emmendations and add-on
November 28, 2007
I: Introduction
On April 26, 2007 Lt. Keith Stevens of the Lexington-Fayette County Sheriff’s Department arrived at the place of my mammy, Jane Hignite, with whom I live. My ma was there as was my youngest sib, Brandon, a 27 twelvemonth yore Adam WHO was born with Downs Syndrome. Lt. Stevens told my mom that he had a bidding to service me in a tiddler detainment cause. The County Attorney’s Office had been look for me for quite a while, he said. Now that they had caught up with me I was in big problem. To my Freemason Brandon, Lt. Stevens said “What do you deliberation of your Freemason nowadays. You are a granduncle and he didn’t eve bowman you. We’re departure to option him in clink for a long clip.” My mum told Lt. Stevens that I was at washing delivering pizza and that he would breakthrough me downtown at my spot of employ, A Slice of Chicago.
Lt. Stevens position his business paper with my ma. He then came to Slice of Chicago, marched into the dorsum of the edifice where the pizza are made and loudly demanded to knowing where I was, stating again for all to hear that Chris Hignite was in a peck of problem. Stevens was told by the proprietor of Slice that I was on a bringing and that he, Stevens, could hold exterior for me to instrument. When I did instrument, Stevens handed me a transcript of a Civil Summons issued for me on November 11, 1997 and signed by Robert M. True and Amy Fowler, a Summons to appear in the suit of Michelle Brizendine and her girl, Madison. Later I would learn that this Civil Summons had been occasioned by a Court Complaint pursuing tike sustainment issued on November 4, 1997, and signed by Fayette County. Margaret Kannensohn and her assistants Byron L. Ockerman, Christopher E. Hutchison, R. Barry Minton.
On April 27, 2007 I called home tribunal lawyer Jenny Scott and on May 1, 2007 my ma and I met with her. Ms. Scott had already collected transcript of paper from the County Attorney’s office, and after some discourse of the suit, I signed a declaration with her, for a letter anchorage of , to represent my interests in the upcoming case. I pointed out to Ms. Scott that, in the upper access corner of the master of the copy with which I had been served someone, at some time, had scripted by hand ‘07-17-06’. Ms. Scott noted with interest that the subdivision entitled ‘Proof of Service’ had not been filled in or signed by either Stevens or myself, thus fashioning the papers appear as if it had never been served at all. “But,” she said, “I do not desiring to brand a deal out of it”.
A further set of facts is even more remarkable. On April 26, 2007 Lt. Keith Stevens told my mother that the County Attorney’s Office had been looking for me “for quite a while”. On June 28, 2007 The DNA nurse told me, in the immanence of Michelle and Madison Brizendine, that her work showed that three endeavor had been made to serve the bidding. [The DNA nurse stated, by the way, that she “didn't work for the city but for the testing facility”; nevertheless, her office has doors adjoining those of both the County Attorney and the Family Court Judge, and she also has access to their mutual conference room.] On May 1, 2007 my lawyer, Jenny Scott also told me that threesome attempt had been made to service the bidding and she showed me a transcript of a part of amanuensis’s volume card relatedness ternary signature and ternion date. Ms. Scott noted, again with considerable involvement, that she had never seen the bidding endeavor listed on a reprint portion of card; furthermore, that in every other lawsuit she had known the date of endeavor to service a bidding and the name of the waiter were written on the dorsum of the bidding itself. “But,” she said, “I do not deprivation to brand a trade putout of it”. Finally, in the finale hebdomad of October, my lawyer, told me that nobody present remembered the line list 3 try to service the Summons, but that the County Attorney’s bureau claim it tin food a C transcript of a line on flake card of ace endeavour to service it. And, yes, you guessed it, my own lawyer, Jenny Scott, did not neediness to brand a trade putout of it.
I, however, did deprivation to brand a trade of it. It was Wednesday, October 31. There was a proceeding of the cause scheduled for November 1 at 9 a.m. The County Attorney was request the jurist for a summary opinion that my lawyer Ms. Scott called “devastating”. I had cleared the case that I could not be at this proceedings and we had agreed that Ms. Scott would enactment in my involvement. Both Tuesday daylight and Wednesday forenoon I tried unsuccessfully to range Ms. Scott by telephone and in individual. I then mitt-delivered and slid under her bureau threshold a missive of instruction containing the particular wording of several movement which I wished to have entered into the tribunal evidence. That eventide my mum, Jane, and my Freemason, Cory visited Michelle Brizendine at her place. And on Thursday morn, Ms. Jenny Scott sold me feather the Aar.
Ms. Scott had decided to settee the matter herself. She said that she didn’t neediness to antecedent complaint relation with anyone in the County Attorney’s agency. She said that my movement would be have been ignored by the Judge. I told her I didn’t tending if the magistrate ignored or denied the movement; the very case that the evidence showed that an endeavour had been made to enter them would have done the shtick. Ms. Scott said she had taken what she idea was the attempt offering and that she didn’t privation to do fight.
Today, on November 6, 2007 at 4:29 p.m. my lawyer, Jenny Scott finally returned a figure of call that I had made to her. She said again that she had publication my motion, she said there were “valid point” in all of them. Nevertheless, she would be the laughing capital of home judicature if she had attempted to record them, she was a home judicature lawyer, she did not mark on with me to return on the County Attorney’s bureau, and perhaps I needed to see a malefactor attorney. To option the substance as she herself had option it at our very former assemblage: “My daddy told me not to dirt where I eat.”
The motion, “the valid point” that would brand Ms. Scott “the laughing capital of home judicature” were based on these followers sestet claim:
The County Attorney has a documented past of harassing me.
I am privy to secrets that the County Attorney would not privation leaked to the populace.
The mum removed the fry from the Soviets and didn’t pursue fry upkeep so as not to have to vexation about detainment engagement with the design of lift the youngster as her own with another Father.
The County Attorney’s child support division is plagued with fault and incompetence fashioning this a success place to spot someone if you want to harass them. One could always claim later that the mistakes were due to incompetence and an apology would be given for your time in gaol and the disbursal of your attorney.
Michelle has made it a wont of changing her story to case her demand and therefore cipher she say tin be taken with any sureness.
A similar situation occurred in Scott County with a ten yr old suit that re-appeared after being dismissed originally. The officers in the case stated on entering that they had been asked to harass me by members of the Lexington Vice Squad. Ten year later, in 2005, the inspected was re-entered into the computer and enrolled and un-finished. This made it seemed that I had been avoiding them for ten yr. Once again damaging my reputation and costing me money.
The remainder of this series of articles will substantiate these claim.
Written by HigniteFiles
Professional author, photographer and videographer
Related posts: